rebekahj Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Also, I am sick of hearing about different methods of "winning the war on terror." Seriously, what war? Why don't we just declare a war on all things bad? You can't win a war on an idea.
YolandaGuadalupe Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Get OUT of Iraq !
LordXmen2k Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Funny how Bush and McCain keep tripping over each other and following Barack Obamas foreign policy positions.They might wanna have Senator Obama on speed dial to tell them what to do to fix the economy too. OBAMA 08
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Olbermann is a bit too pie eyed for the Democraps. Could it be that he really thinks they are different?
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Olbermann is pretty good at pissing off ignorant right wing propaganda. I bet you cannot tell me one lie Olbermann has told on his show yet thousands of examples are available for Fox News. Scurry back under the couch little right wing cockroach!
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - You want to have a look at my channel before you call me Right Wing you moron!I just pointed out that there is NO difference to speak of between Reps and Dems, how does that make me right wing? There is NO difference between the two in case you haven't noticed Dems doing NOTHING AT ALL to stop or even slow down the NeoCon's madness parade. If you hold that either party is anything but a sock puppet for Zionists and Military Industrial Complex, then you are a centrist...in a fascist land!
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I am a Libertarian.Try a Nolan chart and tell me you are more left than me! nolanchartdotcom/surveydotphpI bet you are nothing like what you label yourself and will thus damn the test as wrong, but a bit of research might persuade you not to be so foolish as to say it publicly.I think anybody who replies like you did out of such a tiny edge of demarcation from what he decries, is the cockroach actually. Have you no more imagination than to assume that criticism of dems makes me a rep?
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I am neither right nor left. And we can agree. My point was that he is telling truth and right now the republicans are the bad guys if you will in the soap opera called the american electoral process. So it seems he is for the democrats. we will have to see if he talks truth to president obama
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I am a fan of Olberman because he does tell the truth and he tells it well. However he disappoints me when equates dems with a better way when he of all people should be aware that they have not lived up to anything like this. He was aware after they showed how spineless they were after 2006. So why does he play into the false paradigm? Obama will not necessarily be pres. You assume you will get an election and at this point I'd say that has got to be a less certain thing than ever before.
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - The establishment needs to whitewash all the crimes. Obama is presented almost as the savior. He will win. This will show that democracy is alive and well being that he is black and president. His name also helps him with the muslim world. The whole thing will be to say forget the past and now let's build a great nation. Same story every time there is an election. The nation starts of new everyt ime and the crimes are forgotten.
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Thing is, the rest of the world that endured those crimes do not forget. Be it for generations. Then 911 happens and the American people do not know why it happened. The government knows why...blowback...but it is sold to the american people that they hate us for our freedoms....those who do not understand history...are doomed to repeat it
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - A shot and a miss...but 99 times out of a 100 it is a right wing nut job making replies...now It seems that you are not...
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I did the nolan chart...as I thought I would be :)
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - 9/11 was sold as blowback on the gatekeepers side but it was no such thing. It was so obviously an inside job, from conception to execution all the credible evidence points to those who benefited most by it. This is nothing new, ALL wars are started by the aggressor with a false flag action designed to demonise the intended victims.It is sold on two tiers to the American people. On the one tier as a "Hate our freedoms" type thing and on the other as blowback, it was neither. Rats in a maze.
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Which is?
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I have a slightly different take. The terrorists did hit on 911 but the government knew and was keeping tabs on them and allowed it to happen. They could have even placed explosives to make sure but I would not go as far as that but still they knew in advance and helped make it happen.
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I believe that the "terrorists" were taking flight lessons and some at least were going through the motions as if to appear to be involved. There is no credible evidence of any such men on the day and some inconsistencies. 9 of them are still alive so that is a problem. Most importantly is that the WTCs could not have collapsed the way they did due only to planes and short duration sub optimal fires. None of those men could have piloted the aircraft according to all pilots who have commented.
Rabbitvoz Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Read this. The author is one of the smartest US businessmen and political commentators I know. His breadth of vision is grand and should inspire anyone. HE and men and women like him are the reason I still hold out hope for the USA.Olbermann doesn't quite do it. He is a player not a slayer of the system which is in place.AND you need to slay the beast which has risen up on the banks of the Potomac, it no longer serves or cares to serve the American people.renseDOTcom/general82/woundsDOThtm
heartofdrakn Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - I will check it out thanx
rebekahj Says:
Nov 18, 2008 - Whoo hoo, who freaking cares? It's been more than five years and we're supposed to get excited over ANY sort of distant timeline?